The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||23||49%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||2||4%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||11%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||7%|
|Student > Master||2||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||11%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||7%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||7%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,273,038 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 435,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,273,038 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.